Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 00:50
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
The Louvre, the world’s most-visited museum, shuts down to sound the alarm on mass tourism - PBS
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Healthy Returns: Ozempic, Wegovy linked to rare cases of serious eye condition - CNBC
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What are some K-Pop group names that sounds pretty?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Hic perferendis in et impedit quo.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Could Humans Transform Into Another Species? Discover the Neurobiology Behind It! - Glass Almanac
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Country music singer opens up about HIV status, sexuality with release of new song - MassLive